PCL vs. PJFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) and PJFG (PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCL is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while PJFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PJFG.

Performance

PCL vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCL achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than PJFG's 6.64% return.

PCL

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJFG

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 6.58%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 6M: 5.59%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: 24.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCL vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF	1.46%	2.51%
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF	6.64%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PCL and PJFG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

PCL vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFG

PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 28
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCL vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCL	PJFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	1.36	-0.75

Drawdowns

PCL vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCL drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCL and PJFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCL	PJFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-24.24%	+19.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-2.16%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-3.75%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCL	PJFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.89%	16.83%	-8.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.89%	20.88%	-12.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.89%	20.88%	-12.99%

PCL vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCL vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison

PCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, while PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF	5.31%	2.52%
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCL and PJFG in my portfolio?

PCL and PJFG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCL or PJFG?

On fees, PCL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCL or PJFG?

PCL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCL or PJFG?

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.00% for PJFG.

What is the main difference between PCL and PJFG?

PCL is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PJFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCL and 0.75% for PJFG.