PCIG vs. PCLG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PCIG (Polen Capital International Growth ETF) and PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while PCLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Polen. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCIG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PCLG.

Performance

PCIG vs. PCLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCIG achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly higher than PCLG's -10.52% return.

PCIG

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: -8.43%
• YTD: -3.68%
• 1Y: -8.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCLG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: -11.53%
• YTD: -10.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCIG vs. PCLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	-3.68%	-2.75%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	-10.52%	-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PCIG and PCLG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

PCIG vs. PCLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCIG

PCIG Risk / Return Rank: 5
PCIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PCIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PCLG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCIG vs. PCLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCIG	PCLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.99	—	—

Drawdowns

PCIG vs. PCLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCIG drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PCLG drawdown of -23.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIG and PCLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCIG	PCLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-23.78%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.82%	-14.45%	+1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-10.31%	+2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCIG	PCLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.39%	17.81%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	17.81%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	17.81%	+0.49%

PCIG vs. PCLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCIG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCIG vs. PCLG - Dividend Comparison

PCIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than PCLG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	0.15%	0.14%	0.36%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.03%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCIG and PCLG in my portfolio?

PCIG and PCLG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCIG or PCLG?

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCIG or PCLG?

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCIG or PCLG?

PCIG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.

What is the main difference between PCIG and PCLG?

PCIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PCLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCIG and 0.49% for PCLG.