PCIG vs. COMT
PCIG (Polen Capital International Growth ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. PCIG is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, PCIG returned -4.20% vs 32.33% for COMT. Their -0.08 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PCIG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
PCIG vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCIG achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 29.71% return.
PCIG
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- -4.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.18%
COMT
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.37M | $10.68M | $14.03M | |
| $54.08K | $64.30K | $56.43K |
PCIG vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF | -3.73% | -0.02% | -8.47% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 29.71% | 6.07% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCIG and COMT is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024 | -0.08 |
The correlation between PCIG and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCIG vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
PCIG
COMT
PCIG vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCIG | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.85 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 5.74 | -6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCIG vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCIG drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIG and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCIG | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -51.89% | +28.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.69% | -17.57% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -11.61% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -23.90% | +16.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.48% | 5.65% | +3.83% |
Volatility
PCIG vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.28%. This indicates that PCIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCIG | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 5.28% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 19.54% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 21.66% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 21.10% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 18.86% | -0.50% |
PCIG vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCIG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCIG vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
PCIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than COMT's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.97% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.14% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCIG and COMT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCIG has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to COMT (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCIG dropped -23.40% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 32.33% vs -4.20% for PCIG. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 32.33% return vs -4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCIG.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 0.15% for PCIG.
PCIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Polen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCIG and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCIG and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer