PCIG vs. PCGG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PCIG (Polen Capital International Growth ETF) and PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while PCGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Polen. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PCIG returned -4.20% vs -5.25% for PCGG. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

PCIG vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCIG achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -5.73% return.

PCIG

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.45%
• 6M: -5.26%
• YTD: -3.73%
• 1Y: -4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.18%

PCGG

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: -2.39%
• YTD: -5.73%
• 1Y: -5.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	$21.56K	$40.61K	$39.96K
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	$54.08K	$64.30K	$56.43K

PCIG vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	-3.73%	-0.02%	-8.47%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	-5.73%	1.62%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PCIG and PCGG is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024	0.80

The correlation between PCIG and PCGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

PCIG vs. PCGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PCIG	PCGG
Technology	21.8%	41.4%
Financial Services	9.6%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	9.6%
Communication Services	6.2%	15.0%
Energy	5.6%	-
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.1%
Healthcare	3.1%	7.4%
Industrials	2.2%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	1.3%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

PCIG vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCIG

PCIG Risk / Return Rank: 7
PCIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PCIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PCIG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PCIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PCIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

PCGG

PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 7
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCIG vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCIG	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	-0.32	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	-0.34	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.96	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	-0.23	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.44	-0.50	+0.05

PCIG vs. PCGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the PCGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCIG and PCGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCIG vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCIG drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGG drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIG and PCGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCIG	PCGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-22.66%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.69%	-22.66%	+1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.86%	-10.44%	-2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-5.40%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.48%	10.57%	-1.09%

Volatility

PCIG vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison

Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) at 4.62%. This indicates that PCIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCIG	PCGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	4.62%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.18%	13.45%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	16.30%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	16.75%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	16.75%	+1.61%

PCIG vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PCIG and PCGG have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

PCIG vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison

PCIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF	0.15%	0.14%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCIG and PCGG in my portfolio?

PCIG and PCGG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCIG or PCGG?

PCIG has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to PCGG (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCIG dropped -23.40% vs PCGG's -22.66%.

Which ETF is better, PCIG or PCGG?

On 1-year performance, PCIG leads with -4.20% vs -5.25% for PCGG. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, PCGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PCIG or PCGG?

Over the 1-year period, PCIG has performed better with a -4.20% return vs -5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCIG or PCGG?

PCIG and PCGG have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCIG or PCGG?

PCIG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.

What is the main difference between PCIG and PCGG?

PCIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PCGG is Global Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.