PCGG vs. GABF

In the year-to-date period, PCGG achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's 0.06% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PCGG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PCGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGG and GABF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%.

The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -20.22%, roughly equal to the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and GABF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) is 6.30%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that PCGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.