PCGG vs. GABF
PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PCGG returned -7.39% vs -4.43% for GABF. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCGG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
PCGG vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCGG achieves a -7.55% return, which is significantly lower than GABF's -1.86% return.
PCGG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -7.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GABF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCGG vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | -7.55% | 1.62% | 12.40% | 4.17% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -1.86% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 15.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCGG and GABF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PCGG and GABF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
PCGG vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PCGG
GABF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
-
Technology
PCGG
GABF
Financial Services
PCGG
GABF
Communication Services
PCGG
GABF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PCGG
GABF
-
Industrials
PCGG
GABF
Healthcare
PCGG
GABF
-
Consumer Defensive
PCGG
GABF
-
Basic Materials
PCGG
GABF
-
Utilities
PCGG
GABF
-
Real Estate
PCGG
GABF
Energy
PCGG
-
GABF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCGG vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
PCGG
GABF
PCGG vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCGG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.97 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | -0.26 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | -0.57 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCGG vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCGG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -20.86% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | -17.16% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.17% | -6.69% | -5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -4.95% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.11% | 7.79% | +2.32% |
Volatility
PCGG vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.51%. This indicates that PCGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCGG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 4.51% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 13.37% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 17.57% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 20.44% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 20.44% | -3.72% |
PCGG vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCGG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCGG vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.00% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% |
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCGG and GABF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCGG has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to GABF (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGG dropped -22.66% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 1-year performance, GABF leads with -4.43% vs -7.39% for PCGG. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GABF has performed better with a -4.43% return vs -7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.
GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.
PCGG is categorized as Global Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Polen and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCGG and 0.10% for GABF.
GABF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCGG and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer