PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCGG vs. GABF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCGG vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCGG achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than GABF's -5.24% return.


PCGG

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.68%
YTD
-5.56%
6M
-5.24%
1Y
-4.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GABF

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-5.24%
6M
-2.61%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCGG vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PCGG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
-5.56%1.62%12.40%4.01%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
-5.24%3.60%44.38%15.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PCGG and GABF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023

0.62

The correlation between PCGG and GABF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PCGG vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PCGG
GABF

Technology

40.1%
4.9%

Financial Services

17.5%
84.6%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Healthcare

13.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Real Estate

2.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PCGG
40.1%
GABF
4.9%

Financial Services

PCGG
17.5%
GABF
84.6%

Communication Services

PCGG
15.8%
GABF

-

Healthcare

PCGG
13.0%
GABF

-

Consumer Cyclical

PCGG
9.4%
GABF

-

Consumer Defensive

PCGG
2.3%
GABF

-

Real Estate

PCGG
2.0%
GABF
6.0%

Basic Materials

PCGG

-

GABF

-

Energy

PCGG

-

GABF

-

Industrials

PCGG

-

GABF
4.6%

Utilities

PCGG

-

GABF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCGG vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCGG
PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GABF
GABF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCGG vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCGGGABFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.27

-0.06

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.27

0.04

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.00

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

-0.07

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.44

-0.16

-0.28

PCGG vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCGG Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCGG and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCGGGABFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

-0.06

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.90

-0.64

Drawdowns

PCGG vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and GABF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCGGGABFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-20.86%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.66%

-17.16%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.28%

-9.89%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-4.85%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.10%

7.23%

+1.87%

Volatility

PCGG vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) is 3.47%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that PCGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCGGGABFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.89%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

13.02%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

17.26%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

20.53%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

20.53%

-3.91%

PCGG vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCGG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCGG vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
2.07%1.96%4.19%4.95%1.31%
PCGG
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCGG and GABF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABF has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to PCGG (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCGG dropped -22.66% vs GABF's -20.86%.

On 1-year performance, GABF leads with -0.98% vs -4.12% for PCGG. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PCGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GABF has performed better with a -0.98% return vs -4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.

PCGG is categorized as Global Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Polen and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCGG and 0.10% for GABF.

GABF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCGG and GABF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer