PCGG vs. GSIB
Compare and contrast key facts about Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB).
PCGG and GSIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PCGG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2023. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PCGG or GSIB.
Correlation
The correlation between PCGG and GSIB is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PCGG vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PCGG:
-0.16
GSIB:
1.72
PCGG:
-0.09
GSIB:
2.25
PCGG:
0.99
GSIB:
1.33
PCGG:
-0.15
GSIB:
2.08
PCGG:
-0.62
GSIB:
10.33
PCGG:
4.80%
GSIB:
3.56%
PCGG:
18.87%
GSIB:
21.40%
PCGG:
-20.22%
GSIB:
-17.71%
PCGG:
-15.85%
GSIB:
-9.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCGG achieves a -10.88% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 7.78% return.
PCGG
-10.88%
-8.15%
-9.66%
-2.07%
N/A
N/A
GSIB
7.78%
-8.48%
11.18%
34.35%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCGG vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCGG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PCGG vs. GSIB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PCGG
GSIB
PCGG vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PCGG vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| TTM | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.55% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
PCGG vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -20.22%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and GSIB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PCGG vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) is 12.84%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 13.59%. This indicates that PCGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.