PCGG vs. PCLG
PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) and PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while PCLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Polen. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PCGG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PCLG.
Performance
PCGG vs. PCLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCGG achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly higher than PCLG's -8.60% return.
PCGG
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- 6M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 1Y
- -5.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.00%
PCLG
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.56K | $40.61K | $39.96K | |
| $232.64K | $284.12K | $564.55K |
PCGG vs. PCLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | -5.73% | -2.53% |
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | -8.60% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCGG and PCLG is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCGG vs. PCLG — Risk / Return Rank
PCGG
PCLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCGG vs. PCLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCGG | PCLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCGG vs. PCLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, roughly equal to the maximum PCLG drawdown of -23.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and PCLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCGG | PCLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -23.78% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -12.61% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -10.74% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.57% | — | — |
Volatility
PCGG vs. PCLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCGG | PCLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 18.04% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 18.04% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 18.04% | -1.29% |
PCGG vs. PCLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCGG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCGG vs. PCLG - Dividend Comparison
PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PCGG and PCLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.
PCLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.
PCGG is categorized as Global Equities, while PCLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCGG and 0.49% for PCLG.
Find the right allocation for PCGG and PCLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer