PCFT.L vs. CL
PCFT.L (Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. PCFT.L operates in Collective Investments (Financial Services), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PCFT.L returned 11.68%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for CL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PCFT.L vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PCFT.L is traded in GBp, while CL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCFT.L achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PCFT.L has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 11.68%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.96% annualized return.
PCFT.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
CL
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- -3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
PCFT.L vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCFT.L Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc | -1.34% | 24.68% | 31.76% | 0.81% | -9.24% | 25.04% | 0.15% | 24.36% | -13.50% | 15.53% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 9.14% | -17.32% | 18.60% | -1.40% | 5.80% | 3.05% | 23.43% | 14.08% | -14.40% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCFT.L and CL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
PCFT.L:
£542.32M
CL:
$68.33B
PCFT.L:
£0.90
CL:
$2.58
PCFT.L:
2.47
CL:
32.90
PCFT.L:
0.00
CL:
8.50
PCFT.L:
2.94
CL:
3.30
PCFT.L:
1.44
CL:
471.23
PCFT.L:
£184.77M
CL:
$20.80B
PCFT.L:
£181.04M
CL:
$12.49B
PCFT.L:
£232.42M
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCFT.L vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
PCFT.L
CL
PCFT.L vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCFT.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.99 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | -0.19 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | -0.32 | +3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCFT.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | -0.16 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.20 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.24 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.49 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PCFT.L vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCFT.L drawdown since its inception was -40.21%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -29.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFT.L and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCFT.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.21% | -29.32% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.08% | -17.07% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -29.32% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.05% | -29.32% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.21% | -29.32% | -10.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -20.36% | +16.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -7.77% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 10.27% | -6.24% |
Volatility
PCFT.L vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) is 3.66%, while Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that PCFT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCFT.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 6.28% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 17.23% | -4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 21.45% | -6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 19.17% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 20.82% | -0.97% |
Dividends
PCFT.L vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
PCFT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than CL's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.46% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
PCFT.L Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc | 4.07% | 2.76% | 2.40% | 3.01% | 2.88% | 2.32% | 2.51% | 4.03% | 2.68% | 2.06% | 2.10% | 2.97% |
Financials
PCFT.L vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PCFT.L and CL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PCFT.L and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer