PBW vs. VIOG
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) and VIOG (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - PBW tracks the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX) while VIOG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBW returned 7.70%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for VIOG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBW charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VIOG.
Performance
PBW vs. VIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBW achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than VIOG's 22.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PBW has underperformed VIOG with an annualized return of 7.70%, while VIOG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.
PBW
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -14.83%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 55.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.93%
- 5Y*
- -14.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
VIOG
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
PBW vs. VIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 12.09% | 53.96% | -30.77% | -20.03% | -44.55% | -29.86% | 204.82% | 62.58% | -14.11% | 39.92% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 22.77% | 5.40% | 9.23% | 16.92% | -21.14% | 22.49% | 19.68% | 21.16% | -4.57% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBW and VIOG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PBW and VIOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PBW vs. VIOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBW
VIOG
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PBW
VIOG
Basic Materials
PBW
VIOG
Energy
PBW
VIOG
Consumer Cyclical
PBW
VIOG
Technology
PBW
VIOG
Utilities
PBW
VIOG
Consumer Defensive
PBW
VIOG
Financial Services
PBW
VIOG
Communication Services
PBW
-
VIOG
Healthcare
PBW
-
VIOG
Real Estate
PBW
-
VIOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBW vs. VIOG — Risk / Return Rank
PBW
VIOG
PBW vs. VIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBW | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.14 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 10.77 | -4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBW vs. VIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBW drawdown since its inception was -89.02%, which is greater than VIOG's maximum drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBW and VIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBW | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.02% | -41.73% | -47.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.22% | -9.03% | -18.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.04% | -27.35% | -40.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.50% | -29.15% | -55.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.02% | -41.73% | -47.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.75% | -3.27% | -68.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -7.58% | -55.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.62% | 2.63% | +6.99% |
Volatility
PBW vs. VIOG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) at 5.25%. This indicates that PBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBW | VIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 5.25% | +8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.08% | 13.06% | +19.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.18% | 17.92% | +25.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.54% | 21.53% | +22.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.09% | 22.82% | +16.27% |
PBW vs. VIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBW vs. VIOG - Dividend Comparison
PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than VIOG's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 1.39% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 0.77% | 1.04% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 1.09% | 0.76% | 0.87% | 0.92% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBW and VIOG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBW has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to VIOG (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBW dropped -89.02% vs VIOG's -41.73%.
On 10-year performance, VIOG leads with 11.03% vs 7.70% for PBW. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIOG has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.
PBW has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.77% for VIOG.
PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX), while VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PBW and 0.15% for VIOG.
VIOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBW and VIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer