PBUS vs. QWLD
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index while QWLD tracks the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 12.30%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for QWLD. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.
Performance
PBUS vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than QWLD's 9.39% return.
PBUS
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.93%
QWLD
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.29M | $14.70M | $26.21M | |
| $231.12K | $297.84K | $1.04M |
PBUS vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.03% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 9.39% | 17.93% | 14.44% | 19.59% | -13.30% | 21.57% | 10.24% | 27.59% | -7.02% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and QWLD is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PBUS and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBUS vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBUS
QWLD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBUS
QWLD
Financial Services
PBUS
QWLD
Communication Services
PBUS
QWLD
Consumer Cyclical
PBUS
QWLD
Healthcare
PBUS
QWLD
Industrials
PBUS
QWLD
Consumer Defensive
PBUS
QWLD
Energy
PBUS
QWLD
Utilities
PBUS
QWLD
Real Estate
PBUS
QWLD
Basic Materials
PBUS
QWLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
QWLD
PBUS vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBUS | QWLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.44 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.92 | 10.67 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and QWLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | QWLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -31.89% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -7.66% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -12.40% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -22.84% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -3.66% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.75% | +0.40% |
Volatility
PBUS vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that PBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | QWLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 2.30% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 7.73% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 9.71% | +3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 13.51% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 15.12% | +4.14% |
PBUS vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBUS vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than QWLD's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 1.02% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.79% | 1.85% | 1.74% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBUS and QWLD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBUS has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs QWLD's -31.89%.
On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 12.30% vs 10.03% for QWLD. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QWLD.
QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.02% for PBUS.
PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.30% for QWLD.
QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and QWLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer