PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBUS vs. QWLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBUS vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than QWLD's 9.39% return.


PBUS

1D
0.70%
1M
0.20%
6M
8.62%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%

QWLD

1D
0.22%
1M
1.63%
6M
6.46%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.29M$14.70M$26.21M
$231.12K$297.84K$1.04M

PBUS vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.03%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
9.39%17.93%14.44%19.59%-13.30%21.57%10.24%27.59%-7.02%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and QWLD is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.84

The correlation between PBUS and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBUS vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBUS
QWLD

Technology

37.9%
24.9%

Financial Services

11.4%
16.5%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

9.1%
13.2%

Industrials

9.0%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.1%

Energy

3.1%
3.4%

Utilities

2.2%
3.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.5%

Technology

PBUS
37.9%
QWLD
24.9%

Financial Services

PBUS
11.4%
QWLD
16.5%

Communication Services

PBUS
9.8%
QWLD
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PBUS
9.6%
QWLD
6.3%

Healthcare

PBUS
9.1%
QWLD
13.2%

Industrials

PBUS
9.0%
QWLD
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

PBUS
4.5%
QWLD
8.1%

Energy

PBUS
3.1%
QWLD
3.4%

Utilities

PBUS
2.2%
QWLD
3.8%

Real Estate

PBUS
1.8%
QWLD
1.0%

Basic Materials

PBUS
1.7%
QWLD
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBUS vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBUS vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBUSQWLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.44

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

10.67

-1.76

PBUS vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and QWLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBUSQWLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-31.89%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-7.66%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-12.40%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-22.84%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-3.66%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.75%

+0.40%

Volatility

PBUS vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that PBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBUSQWLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

2.30%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

7.73%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

9.71%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

13.51%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

15.12%

+4.14%

PBUS vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBUS vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than QWLD's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
1.02%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
1.79%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBUS and QWLD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBUS has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 12.30% vs 10.03% for QWLD. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.02% for PBUS.

PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBUS and QWLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer