PBUS vs. BASG
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and BASG (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for BASG.
Performance
PBUS vs. BASG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than BASG's 4.35% return.
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BASG
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS vs. BASG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 13.87% |
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF | 4.35% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and BASG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. BASG — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
BASG
PBUS vs. BASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBUS | BASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBUS | BASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.41 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. BASG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than BASG's maximum drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and BASG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | BASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -19.30% | -13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.98% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -5.84% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility
PBUS vs. BASG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | BASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 16.65% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 16.65% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 16.65% | +2.68% |
PBUS vs. BASG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BASG's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBUS vs. BASG - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while BASG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBUS and BASG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for BASG.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for BASG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Brown Advisory. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.61% for BASG.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and BASG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer