PBP vs. AMDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. PBP is passively managed, while AMDW is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

PBP vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.

PBP

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 18.32%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

AMDW

• 1D: 4.91%
• 1M: 72.80%
• YTD: 192.40%
• 6M: 186.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBP vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.90%	9.44%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	192.40%	34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PBP and AMDW is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.42

PBP vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBP	AMDW
Technology	39.5%	28.6%
Financial Services	11.4%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Healthcare	8.6%	-
Industrials	7.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

PBP vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 82
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBP vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBP	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBP	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	4.83	-4.48

Drawdowns

PBP vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBP	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.43%	-34.64%	-8.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-14.66%	+7.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBP	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.87%	81.56%	-74.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.86%	81.56%	-69.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.66%	81.56%	-67.90%

PBP vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBP vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	28.98%	34.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.16%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBP and AMDW in my portfolio?

PBP and AMDW have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PBP or AMDW?

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBP or AMDW?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBP or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 11.16% for PBP.

What is the main difference between PBP and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 0.99% for AMDW.