PBJ vs. GXPS
PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) and GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - PBJ tracks the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index while GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GXPS.
Performance
PBJ vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 7.14% return.
PBJ
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 0.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBJ vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 6.38% | -7.95% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 7.14% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBJ and GXPS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBJ vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
PBJ
GXPS
PBJ vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBJ | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBJ | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PBJ vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and GXPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBJ | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -9.20% | -29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -7.97% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -3.87% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | — | — |
Volatility
PBJ vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBJ | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 13.97% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 13.97% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 13.97% | +1.14% |
PBJ vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBJ vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than GXPS's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.58% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBJ and GXPS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.
PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.25% for GXPS.
Find the right allocation for PBJ and GXPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer