PBJ vs. FSTA
PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - PBJ tracks the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index while FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBJ returned 5.27%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for FSTA. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.
Performance
PBJ vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than FSTA's 5.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PBJ has underperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 5.27%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.57% annualized return.
PBJ
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 0.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
FSTA
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
PBJ vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 6.38% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.79% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBJ and FSTA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PBJ and FSTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBJ vs. FSTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBJ
FSTA
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PBJ
FSTA
Consumer Cyclical
PBJ
FSTA
Basic Materials
PBJ
FSTA
Industrials
PBJ
FSTA
Financial Services
PBJ
FSTA
-
Communication Services
PBJ
-
FSTA
-
Energy
PBJ
-
FSTA
-
Healthcare
PBJ
-
FSTA
Real Estate
PBJ
-
FSTA
-
Technology
PBJ
-
FSTA
-
Utilities
PBJ
-
FSTA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBJ vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank
PBJ
FSTA
PBJ vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBJ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | 0.21 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 0.11 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 0.22 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBJ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.46 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.61 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PBJ vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and FSTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBJ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -25.13% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -9.29% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.99% | -11.76% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.81% | -16.58% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.49% | -25.13% | -3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -8.55% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -3.55% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 4.54% | +0.68% |
Volatility
PBJ vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 3.74%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBJ | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.08% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 9.77% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 12.38% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 13.11% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 14.56% | +0.55% |
PBJ vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBJ vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FSTA's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.58% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBJ and FSTA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to PBJ (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs FSTA's -25.13%.
On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.57% vs 5.27% for PBJ. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.57% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.58% for PBJ.
PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.08% for FSTA.
FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBJ and FSTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer