PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBJ vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBJ vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PBJ has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 4.90%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.72% annualized return.


PBJ

1D
-1.60%
1M
-0.70%
6M
0.28%
YTD
7.14%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
4.90%
ALL TIME*
7.12%

VDC

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.01%
6M
2.65%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
7.72%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$433.06K$1.59M$798.42K
$33.48M$33.44M$37.93M

PBJ vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
7.14%-1.86%2.49%2.31%3.14%26.88%5.53%17.50%-11.21%1.87%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
10.27%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and VDC is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005

0.82

The correlation between PBJ and VDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBJ vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBJ
VDC

Consumer Defensive

72.8%
97.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
1.1%

Basic Materials

5.7%
0.4%

Industrials

5.6%
0.3%

Technology

2.9%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

PBJ
72.8%
VDC
97.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PBJ
7.7%
VDC
1.1%

Basic Materials

PBJ
5.7%
VDC
0.4%

Industrials

PBJ
5.6%
VDC
0.3%

Technology

PBJ
2.9%
VDC
0.5%

Financial Services

PBJ
0.2%
VDC

-

Communication Services

PBJ

-

VDC

-

Energy

PBJ

-

VDC

-

Healthcare

PBJ

-

VDC
0.0%

Real Estate

PBJ

-

VDC

-

Utilities

PBJ

-

VDC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBJ vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBJ
PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBJ vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBJVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.12

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

0.97

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

1.82

-1.59

PBJ vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBJVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-34.24%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-9.28%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-11.06%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-16.55%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.49%

-25.31%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-4.61%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-3.74%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

4.95%

+0.10%

Volatility

PBJ vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 4.76%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBJVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.87%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

11.43%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

13.79%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

13.44%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

14.76%

+0.40%

PBJ vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBJ vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than VDC's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
1.28%1.83%1.11%1.81%1.82%0.90%1.12%1.21%1.41%0.70%1.56%1.24%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBJ and VDC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to PBJ (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs VDC's -34.24%.

On 10-year performance, VDC leads with 7.72% vs 4.90% for PBJ. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.72% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.28% for PBJ.

PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.09% for VDC.

VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBJ and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer