PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBA achieves a 34.35% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PBA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.23%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.


PBA

1D
0.68%
1M
4.53%
6M
35.27%
YTD
34.35%
1Y
40.82%
3Y*
23.86%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
11.23%

VOO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.64%
6M
8.98%
YTD
10.87%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBA
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
34.35%8.55%13.16%7.81%18.33%36.99%-30.57%31.15%-13.66%21.15%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.87%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PBA and VOO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2010

0.43

The correlation between PBA and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBA
PBA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBAVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.45

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

10.70

-2.98

PBA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBA Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBA drawdown since its inception was -70.87%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.87%

-33.99%

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-8.90%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-18.69%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.37%

-24.52%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.87%

-33.99%

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-3.67%

-11.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

2.04%

+3.26%

Volatility

PBA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.86%. This indicates that PBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

3.86%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

9.96%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64%

12.51%

+7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

16.93%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.89%

18.00%

+14.89%

Dividends

PBA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than VOO's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBA
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
4.14%5.34%5.39%5.70%5.78%6.71%8.56%4.80%5.81%4.36%4.19%6.48%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBA and VOO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBA has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to VOO (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBA dropped -70.87% vs VOO's -33.99%.

PBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer