PBA vs. PPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) and PPL Corporation (PPL).
Performance
PBA vs. PPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBA vs. PPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 18.98% | 8.55% | 13.16% | 7.81% | 18.33% | 36.99% | -30.57% | 31.15% | -13.66% | 21.15% |
PPL PPL Corporation | 9.90% | 11.38% | 23.98% | -3.77% | 0.35% | 12.88% | -16.87% | 33.41% | -3.01% | -5.19% |
Fundamentals
PBA:
$26.05B
PPL:
$28.46B
PBA:
$2.91
PPL:
$1.59
PBA:
15.38
PPL:
24.06
PBA:
0.55
PPL:
20.16
PBA:
3.34
PPL:
3.14
PBA:
1.55
PPL:
1.32
PBA:
$7.81B
PPL:
$9.04B
PBA:
$3.09B
PPL:
$5.76B
PBA:
$3.63B
PPL:
$3.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBA achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than PPL's 9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PBA has outperformed PPL with an annualized return of 11.56%, while PPL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.50% annualized return.
PBA
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
PPL
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBA vs. PPL — Risk / Return Rank
PBA
PPL
PBA vs. PPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) and PPL Corporation (PPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBA | PPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 0.81 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.89 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 2.27 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBA | PPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.53 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.20 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.44 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBA and PPL is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PBA vs. PPL - Dividend Comparison
PBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than PPL's 2.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.62% | 5.34% | 5.39% | 5.70% | 5.78% | 6.71% | 8.56% | 4.80% | 5.81% | 4.36% | 4.19% | 6.48% |
PPL PPL Corporation | 2.89% | 3.11% | 3.17% | 3.54% | 2.99% | 5.52% | 5.89% | 4.60% | 5.79% | 5.11% | 4.46% | 11.74% |
Drawdowns
PBA vs. PPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBA drawdown since its inception was -70.87%, which is greater than PPL's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBA and PPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBA | PPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -55.38% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -11.69% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.37% | -24.73% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.87% | -48.73% | -22.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.39% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -15.67% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 4.58% | +2.61% |
Volatility
PBA vs. PPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) is 3.76%, while PPL Corporation (PPL) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that PBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBA | PPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 5.25% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 12.18% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 17.69% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 18.55% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 22.75% | +10.19% |
Financials
PBA vs. PPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and PPL Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities