PBA vs. SVM
PBA (Pembina Pipeline Corporation) and SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) are both stocks. PBA operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, PBA returned 11.15%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for SVM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PBA vs. SVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBA achieves a 33.43% return, which is significantly higher than SVM's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PBA has underperformed SVM with an annualized return of 11.15%, while SVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.
PBA
- 1D
- 4.42%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 36.33%
- YTD
- 33.43%
- 1Y
- 41.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
SVM
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 80.57%
- 3Y*
- 45.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
PBA vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 33.43% | 8.55% | 13.16% | 7.81% | 18.33% | 36.99% | -30.57% | 31.15% | -13.66% | 21.15% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 10.66% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBA and SVM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between PBA and SVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PBA:
$28.87B
SVM:
$2.04B
PBA:
CA$2.91
SVM:
-$0.05
PBA:
5.41
SVM:
4.64
PBA:
2.69
SVM:
2.16
PBA:
CA$7.57B
SVM:
$437.11M
PBA:
CA$3.06B
SVM:
$254.02M
PBA:
CA$3.69B
SVM:
$185.32M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBA vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank
PBA
SVM
PBA vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBA | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 1.93 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 5.03 | +2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBA vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBA drawdown since its inception was -70.87%, smaller than the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBA and SVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBA | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -98.00% | +27.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.08% | -41.95% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.92% | -42.86% | +24.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.37% | -60.03% | +32.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.87% | -76.19% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -53.37% | +53.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.97% | -71.55% | +56.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 16.12% | -10.82% |
Volatility
PBA vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) is 6.83%, while Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a volatility of 22.28%. This indicates that PBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBA | SVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 22.28% | -15.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 57.47% | -43.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 70.34% | -50.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 56.11% | -34.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.89% | 61.63% | -28.74% |
Dividends
PBA vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison
PBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than SVM's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.17% | 5.34% | 5.39% | 5.70% | 5.78% | 6.71% | 8.56% | 4.80% | 5.81% | 4.36% | 4.19% | 6.48% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
PBA vs. SVM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and Silvercorp Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBA vs. SVM - Profitability Comparison
PBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a gross profit of 797.05M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
PBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported an operating income of 670.73M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
PBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported a net income of 499.29M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 24.1%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBA and SVM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (22.28%) compared to PBA (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBA dropped -70.87% vs SVM's -98.00%.
PBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBA and SVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer