PAYS vs. GFI
PAYS (PaySign, Inc.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. PAYS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, PAYS returned 43.04%/yr vs 27.45%/yr for GFI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAYS vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAYS achieves a 35.73% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYS has outperformed GFI with an annualized return of 43.04%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively lower 27.45% annualized return.
PAYS
- 1D
- 4.48%
- 1M
- 19.90%
- YTD
- 35.73%
- 6M
- 27.32%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 39.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 43.04%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
PAYS vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAYS PaySign, Inc. | 35.73% | 70.53% | 7.86% | 8.53% | 61.25% | -65.52% | -54.29% | 188.35% | 382.19% | 118.56% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAYS and GFI is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2007 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
PAYS:
$426.54M
GFI:
$32.65B
PAYS:
$0.17
GFI:
$5.39
PAYS:
40.69
GFI:
6.78
PAYS:
0.34
GFI:
0.11
PAYS:
4.63
GFI:
2.34
PAYS:
7.75
GFI:
3.87
PAYS:
$91.47M
GFI:
$13.98B
PAYS:
$46.93M
GFI:
$7.34B
PAYS:
$22.09M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAYS vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
PAYS
GFI
PAYS vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAYS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.15 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 3.06 | -2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAYS vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAYS drawdown since its inception was -98.95%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYS and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAYS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.95% | -88.05% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.85% | -43.90% | -18.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.60% | -43.90% | -20.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.77% | -56.22% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.09% | -63.09% | -30.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.06% | -38.93% | -22.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -44.25% | -25.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.19% | 16.51% | +20.68% |
Volatility
PAYS vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 17.34% and 17.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAYS | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.34% | 17.70% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.60% | 46.40% | +5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.57% | 59.94% | +12.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.43% | 52.37% | +15.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.01% | 54.90% | +21.11% |
Dividends
PAYS vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
PAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
PAYS PaySign, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PAYS vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PaySign, Inc. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAYS vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
PAYS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.22M and revenue of 28.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
PAYS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.67M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
PAYS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a net income of 5.44M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAYS and GFI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (17.70%) compared to PAYS (17.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYS dropped -98.95% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAYS and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer