PAYO vs. LU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PAYO (Payoneer Global Inc.) and LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) are both stocks. PAYO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, PAYO returned 4.53%/yr vs -20.35%/yr for LU. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAYO vs. LU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYO achieves a -8.54% return, which is significantly higher than LU's -46.09% return.

PAYO

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: -8.54%
• 6M: -9.03%
• 1Y: -26.88%
• 3Y*: 4.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LU

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -29.23%
• YTD: -46.09%
• 6M: -47.92%
• 1Y: -52.41%
• 3Y*: -20.35%
• 5Y*: -40.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYO vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAYO Payoneer Global Inc.	-8.54%	-44.02%	92.71%	-4.75%	-25.58%	-30.66%
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	-46.09%	7.11%	73.97%	-58.03%	-60.48%	-51.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYO and LU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021	0.26

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) PAYO : $1.07B LU : $31.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAYO : $660.73M LU : $13.50B
EBITDA (TTM) PAYO : $204.88M LU : -$1.26B

Return for Risk

PAYO vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYO

PAYO Risk / Return Rank: 18
PAYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PAYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PAYO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PAYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PAYO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

LU

LU Risk / Return Rank: 8
LU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
LU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
LU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYO vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAYO	LU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	-0.99	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	-1.62	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.81	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	-0.77	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	-1.39	+0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAYO vs. LU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYO Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is higher than the LU Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYO and LU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAYO	LU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57	-0.99	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.49	+0.25

Drawdowns

PAYO vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYO drawdown since its inception was -67.91%, smaller than the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYO and LU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYO	LU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.91%	-96.68%	+28.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.45%	-68.64%	+26.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.36%	-69.41%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.48%	-95.24%	+41.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.47%	-78.40%	+36.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.74%	37.82%	-14.08%

Volatility

PAYO vs. LU - Volatility Comparison

Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) have volatilities of 12.41% and 12.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYO	LU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.41%	12.14%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.67%	34.52%	+3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.16%	53.08%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.61%	76.63%	-21.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.61%	76.25%	-20.64%

Dividends

PAYO vs. LU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAYO nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	101.26%	11.60%	26.29%
PAYO Payoneer Global Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAYO and LU in my portfolio?

PAYO and LU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAYO or LU?

PAYO has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to LU (12.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYO dropped -67.91% vs LU's -96.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAYO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.