LU vs. JACK

In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a 30.54% return, which is significantly higher than JACK's -40.29% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the JACK Sharpe Ratio of -1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LU and JACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 77.56%, more than JACK's 7.18% yield.

The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, which is greater than JACK's maximum drawdown of -82.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and JACK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a higher volatility of 22.06% compared to Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) at 19.51%. This indicates that LU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lufax Holding Ltd and Jack in the Box Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.