LU vs. MMM

In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's 17.35% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LU Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LU and MMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.74%, more than MMM's 1.88% yield.

The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and MMM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a higher volatility of 19.88% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 11.78%. This indicates that LU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lufax Holding Ltd and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.