PAYO vs. MMM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and 3M Company (MMM).

Performance

PAYO vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAYO vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAYO Payoneer Global Inc.	-14.06%	-44.02%	92.71%	-4.75%	-25.58%	-30.66%
MMM 3M Company	-8.87%	26.36%	46.13%	-3.33%	-29.63%	-8.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAYO : $1.75B MMM : $78.29B
EPS PAYO : $0.20 MMM : $6.00
PE Ratio PAYO : 24.66 MMM : 24.21
PS Ratio PAYO : 1.71 MMM : 3.15
PB Ratio PAYO : 2.49 MMM : 16.49
Total Revenue (TTM) PAYO : $1.05B MMM : $24.95B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAYO : $655.68M MMM : $9.87B
EBITDA (TTM) PAYO : $181.21M MMM : $5.85B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYO achieves a -14.06% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's -8.87% return.

PAYO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.46%
• YTD: -14.06%
• 6M: -19.90%
• 1Y: -35.34%
• 3Y*: -8.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMM

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -10.04%
• YTD: -8.87%
• 6M: -6.07%
• 1Y: 0.17%
• 3Y*: 22.36%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: 3.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAYO vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYO

PAYO Risk / Return Rank: 12
PAYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
PAYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PAYO Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PAYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
PAYO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MMM

MMM Risk / Return Rank: 38
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYO vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAYO	MMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	0.01	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	0.23	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.03	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	0.04	-0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.60	0.11	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAYO vs. MMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYO Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYO and MMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAYO	MMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	0.01	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	0.34	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between PAYO and MMM is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAYO vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

PAYO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAYO Payoneer Global Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMM 3M Company	2.04%	1.82%	16.27%	5.49%	4.97%	3.33%	3.36%	3.26%	2.86%	2.00%	2.49%	2.72%

Drawdowns

PAYO vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYO drawdown since its inception was -67.91%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYO and MMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYO	MMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.91%	-59.10%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.44%	-18.77%	-24.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-54.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.29%	-16.44%	-39.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.96%	-16.11%	-24.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.14%	6.45%	+14.69%

Volatility

PAYO vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 8.79%. This indicates that PAYO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYO	MMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.05%	8.79%	+4.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.43%	20.09%	+16.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.06%	30.96%	+21.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.12%	28.08%	+28.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.12%	26.36%	+29.76%

Financials

PAYO vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Payoneer Global Inc. and 3M Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 274.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.06B and revenue of 6.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.

PAYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported an operating income of 28.92M and revenue of 274.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 796.00M and revenue of 6.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

PAYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported a net income of 19.01M and revenue of 274.69M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 577.00M and revenue of 6.13B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.