PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYO vs. MMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYO vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYO achieves a 25.62% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's 2.07% return.


PAYO

1D
0.57%
1M
42.91%
YTD
25.62%
6M
26.98%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10Y*

MMM

1D
-0.85%
1M
6.17%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.03%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYO vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAYO
Payoneer Global Inc.
25.62%-44.02%92.71%-4.75%-25.58%-34.08%
MMM
3M Company
2.07%26.36%46.13%-3.33%-29.63%-7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYO and MMM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2021

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYO:

$2.47B

MMM:

$86.23B

EPS

PAYO:

$0.20

MMM:

$5.17

PE Ratio

PAYO:

35.98

MMM:

31.33

PS Ratio

PAYO:

2.43

MMM:

3.49

PB Ratio

PAYO:

3.75

MMM:

26.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYO:

$1.07B

MMM:

$25.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYO:

$660.73M

MMM:

$9.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYO:

$204.88M

MMM:

$5.28B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYO vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYO
PAYO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MMM
MMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYO vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYOMMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.10

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.63

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

1.37

-1.12

PAYO vs. MMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYO and MMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYO vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYO drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYO and MMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYOMMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.06%

-59.10%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-18.77%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.36%

-22.87%

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.68%

-6.42%

-30.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.03%

-16.10%

-26.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.76%

8.55%

+15.21%

Volatility

PAYO vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) has a higher volatility of 23.32% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 4.83%. This indicates that PAYO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYOMMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.32%

4.83%

+18.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.74%

19.29%

+24.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.92%

25.88%

+27.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.54%

28.31%

+28.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.54%

26.54%

+30.00%

Dividends

PAYO vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

PAYO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMM
3M Company
1.87%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%
PAYO
Payoneer Global Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PAYO vs. MMM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Payoneer Global Inc. and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
261.60M
6.03B
(PAYO) Total Revenue
(MMM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAYO vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Payoneer Global Inc. and 3M Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
40.7%
Portfolio components
PAYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 261.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.46B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

PAYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported an operating income of 30.02M and revenue of 261.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

PAYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Payoneer Global Inc. reported a net income of 19.57M and revenue of 261.60M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYO and MMM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAYO has higher volatility (23.32%) compared to MMM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYO dropped -69.06% vs MMM's -59.10%.

MMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYO and MMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer