PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LU vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LUBABA
YTD Return69.60%17.86%
1Y Return30.30%6.32%
3Y Return (Ann)-40.02%-17.82%
Sharpe Ratio0.640.27
Sortino Ratio1.670.67
Omega Ratio1.201.08
Calmar Ratio0.600.13
Martin Ratio2.570.80
Ulcer Index22.49%12.97%
Daily Std Dev90.79%37.86%
Max Drawdown-96.68%-80.09%
Current Drawdown-91.97%-70.81%

Fundamentals


LUBABA
Market Cap$2.33B$222.85B
EPS-$0.76$3.87
Total Revenue (TTM)$20.24B$708.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.84B$264.16B
EBITDA (TTM)-$1.27B$67.59B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LU and BABA is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LU vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a 69.60% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's 17.86% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.48%
5.38%
LU
BABA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LU vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LU, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LU, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LU, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LU, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LU, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.57
BABA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.80

LU vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LU Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LU and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
0.27
LU
BABA

Dividends

LU vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

LU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.86%, more than BABA's 1.83% yield.


TTM20232022
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
103.86%11.60%26.29%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.83%1.29%0.00%

Drawdowns

LU vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-91.97%
-70.22%
LU
BABA

Volatility

LU vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a higher volatility of 16.14% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.27%. This indicates that LU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.14%
10.27%
LU
BABA

Financials

LU vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lufax Holding Ltd and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items