PAWZ vs. HERD
PAWZ (ProShares Pet Care ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PAWZ tracks the FactSet Pet Care Index while HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAWZ returned -9.39%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for HERD. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PAWZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
PAWZ vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -8.33% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 13.14% return.
PAWZ
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- 6M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- -12.73%
- 3Y*
- -0.92%
- 5Y*
- -9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.51%
HERD
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $163.67K | $196.36K | $206.62K | |
| $91.97K | $88.04K | $268.83K |
PAWZ vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | -8.33% | 1.21% | 3.88% | 12.47% | -40.08% | 10.46% | 61.69% | 6.89% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 13.14% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAWZ and HERD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PAWZ and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAWZ vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAWZ
HERD
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PAWZ
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
PAWZ
HERD
Consumer Defensive
PAWZ
HERD
Technology
PAWZ
HERD
Financial Services
PAWZ
HERD
Basic Materials
PAWZ
HERD
Communication Services
PAWZ
-
HERD
Energy
PAWZ
-
HERD
Industrials
PAWZ
-
HERD
Real Estate
PAWZ
-
HERD
Utilities
PAWZ
-
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAWZ vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
PAWZ
HERD
PAWZ vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAWZ | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.34 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 3.94 | -4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 11.90 | -13.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAWZ vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAWZ | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.07% | -39.41% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.10% | -5.68% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -18.90% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -21.60% | -28.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.02% | 0.00% | -39.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.89% | -4.51% | -18.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.41% | 1.90% | +8.51% |
Volatility
PAWZ vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 3.39%. This indicates that PAWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAWZ | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 3.39% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 8.56% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 11.77% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 17.66% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 20.37% | +1.26% |
PAWZ vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAWZ vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than HERD's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 2.77% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% |
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | 0.70% | 0.81% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.35% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAWZ and HERD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAWZ has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to HERD (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAWZ dropped -50.07% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 10.33% vs -9.39% for PAWZ. On fees, PAWZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 10.33% return vs -9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAWZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.70% for PAWZ.
PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PAWZ and 0.73% for HERD.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAWZ and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer