PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAWZ vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 5.87% return.


PAWZ

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.84%
YTD
-11.47%
6M
-11.85%
1Y
-15.91%
3Y*
-1.31%
5Y*
-9.14%
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.71%
YTD
5.87%
6M
6.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PAWZ and BDVL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.60

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAWZ
BDVL

Healthcare

32.6%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

16.3%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
8.8%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.0%

Technology

4.2%
24.7%

Financial Services

4.1%
13.5%

Communication Services

-

10.0%

Energy

-

2.4%

Industrials

-

15.1%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Healthcare

PAWZ
32.6%
BDVL
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

PAWZ
16.3%
BDVL
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PAWZ
12.5%
BDVL
8.8%

Basic Materials

PAWZ
5.0%
BDVL
3.0%

Technology

PAWZ
4.2%
BDVL
24.7%

Financial Services

PAWZ
4.1%
BDVL
13.5%

Communication Services

PAWZ

-

BDVL
10.0%

Energy

PAWZ

-

BDVL
2.4%

Industrials

PAWZ

-

BDVL
15.1%

Real Estate

PAWZ

-

BDVL
1.2%

Utilities

PAWZ

-

BDVL
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAWZ vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAWZ
PAWZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
PAWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PAWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAWZBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.77

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAWZBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.07%

-7.71%

-42.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.10%

-0.34%

-40.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-1.18%

-21.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.99%

Volatility

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAWZBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

9.66%

+6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

9.66%

+10.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

9.66%

+11.98%

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAWZ vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than BDVL's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
3.52%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
0.86%0.81%0.63%0.44%0.54%0.18%0.14%0.35%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAWZ and BDVL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PAWZ.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.86% for PAWZ.

PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PAWZ and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAWZ and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer