PAWZ vs. BDVL
PAWZ (ProShares Pet Care ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PAWZ tracks the FactSet Pet Care Index while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAWZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 5.87% return.
PAWZ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- -11.47%
- 6M
- -11.85%
- 1Y
- -15.91%
- 3Y*
- -1.31%
- 5Y*
- -9.14%
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 5.87%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | -11.47% | -2.85% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 5.87% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAWZ and BDVL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.60 |
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAWZ
BDVL
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PAWZ
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
PAWZ
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
PAWZ
BDVL
Basic Materials
PAWZ
BDVL
Technology
PAWZ
BDVL
Financial Services
PAWZ
BDVL
Communication Services
PAWZ
-
BDVL
Energy
PAWZ
-
BDVL
Industrials
PAWZ
-
BDVL
Real Estate
PAWZ
-
BDVL
Utilities
PAWZ
-
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAWZ vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank
PAWZ
BDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAWZ | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAWZ | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.07% | -7.71% | -42.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.10% | -0.34% | -40.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.64% | -1.18% | -21.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.99% | — | — |
Volatility
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAWZ | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 9.66% | +6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 9.66% | +10.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 9.66% | +11.98% |
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAWZ vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than BDVL's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.52% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | 0.86% | 0.81% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.35% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAWZ and BDVL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PAWZ.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.86% for PAWZ.
PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PAWZ and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for PAWZ and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer