PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PAWZ vs. ZTS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PAWZ and ZTS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

PAWZ vs. ZTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.00%
-13.98%
PAWZ
ZTS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PAWZ:

0.45

ZTS:

-0.56

Sortino Ratio

PAWZ:

0.74

ZTS:

-0.66

Omega Ratio

PAWZ:

1.09

ZTS:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

PAWZ:

0.16

ZTS:

-0.35

Martin Ratio

PAWZ:

1.23

ZTS:

-1.11

Ulcer Index

PAWZ:

5.67%

ZTS:

12.69%

Daily Std Dev

PAWZ:

15.49%

ZTS:

24.85%

Max Drawdown

PAWZ:

-50.07%

ZTS:

-46.52%

Current Drawdown

PAWZ:

-33.36%

ZTS:

-34.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly higher than ZTS's -3.67% return.


PAWZ

YTD

1.38%

1M

0.96%

6M

-3.00%

1Y

9.79%

5Y*

3.85%

10Y*

N/A

ZTS

YTD

-3.67%

1M

-5.39%

6M

-14.31%

1Y

-16.05%

5Y*

2.55%

10Y*

14.00%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PAWZ vs. ZTS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAWZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAWZ is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAWZ is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAWZ is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAWZ is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAWZ is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAWZ is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZTS is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZTS is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZTS is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZTS is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZTS is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZTS is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PAWZ vs. ZTS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PAWZ, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.45-0.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for PAWZ, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.74-0.82
The chart of Omega ratio for PAWZ, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.090.90
The chart of Calmar ratio for PAWZ, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.16-0.42
The chart of Martin ratio for PAWZ, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.23-1.30
PAWZ
ZTS

The current PAWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the ZTS Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAWZ and ZTS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.45
-0.67
PAWZ
ZTS

Dividends

PAWZ vs. ZTS - Dividend Comparison

PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than ZTS's 1.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
0.63%0.64%0.44%0.54%0.18%0.14%0.34%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
1.15%1.06%0.76%0.89%0.41%0.48%0.50%0.59%0.58%0.71%0.69%0.67%

Drawdowns

PAWZ vs. ZTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than ZTS's maximum drawdown of -46.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and ZTS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-33.36%
-34.77%
PAWZ
ZTS

Volatility

PAWZ vs. ZTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is 3.55%, while Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that PAWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.55%
8.74%
PAWZ
ZTS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab