PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 5.14% return.


PAVE

1D
0.56%
1M
0.42%
YTD
20.55%
6M
19.00%
1Y
37.89%
3Y*
27.31%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*

XYLD

1D
0.17%
1M
1.87%
YTD
5.14%
6M
6.53%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.55%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%14.11%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
5.14%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and XYLD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.66

The correlation between PAVE and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAVE vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAVE
XYLD

Industrials

74.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

20.3%
1.8%

Utilities

3.2%
2.3%

Technology

1.1%
35.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
4.9%

Energy

0.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

PAVE
74.8%
XYLD
8.3%

Basic Materials

PAVE
20.3%
XYLD
1.8%

Utilities

PAVE
3.2%
XYLD
2.3%

Technology

PAVE
1.1%
XYLD
35.6%

Consumer Defensive

PAVE
0.3%
XYLD
4.9%

Energy

PAVE
0.2%
XYLD
3.5%

Communication Services

PAVE

-

XYLD
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PAVE

-

XYLD
10.2%

Financial Services

PAVE

-

XYLD
11.8%

Healthcare

PAVE

-

XYLD
8.5%

Real Estate

PAVE

-

XYLD
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAVEXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.65

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.39

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

18.02

-6.30

PAVE vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAVEXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.74

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-33.46%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-5.29%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-15.53%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-18.66%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

0.00%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-3.72%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

0.99%

+2.25%

Volatility

PAVE vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.85%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

0.85%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

5.37%

+9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

6.54%

+12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

11.22%

+10.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

14.21%

+10.17%

PAVE vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than XYLD's 10.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.50%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and XYLD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAVE has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to XYLD (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.52% vs 7.76% for XYLD. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.50%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.

PAVE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer