PAVE vs. XLE
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 20.12%/yr for XLE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
PAVE vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
PAVE vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | 4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and XLE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PAVE and XLE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PAVE vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
XLE
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PAVE
XLE
-
Basic Materials
PAVE
XLE
-
Utilities
PAVE
XLE
-
Technology
PAVE
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
XLE
-
Energy
PAVE
XLE
Communication Services
PAVE
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
XLE
-
Financial Services
PAVE
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
PAVE
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
PAVE
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
XLE
PAVE vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.10 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 8.63 | +2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -71.26% | +27.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -12.05% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -20.14% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -26.04% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -8.01% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -17.97% | +11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 4.32% | -1.05% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) have volatilities of 7.35% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 7.26% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 16.79% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 20.57% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 26.05% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 29.58% | -5.18% |
PAVE vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAVE vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and XLE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.12% vs 17.84% for PAVE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.08% for XLE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer