PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 8.63% return.


PAVE

1D
1.01%
1M
1.64%
YTD
20.86%
6M
18.50%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*

NEE

1D
1.36%
1M
-9.47%
YTD
8.63%
6M
6.81%
1Y
18.32%
3Y*
8.11%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.86%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%13.41%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
8.63%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and NEE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVENEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.17

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.37

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

3.78

+7.54

PAVE vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum NEE drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVENEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-47.81%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-14.53%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-34.57%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-44.97%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-11.50%

+10.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-8.93%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

5.25%

-1.98%

Volatility

PAVE vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.35%, while NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVENEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

8.52%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

16.75%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

23.78%

-4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

26.91%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

25.49%

-1.09%

Dividends

PAVE vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than NEE's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.77%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and NEE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEE has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs NEE's -47.81%.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer