PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEE vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEE vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEE achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, NEE has outperformed DUK with an annualized return of 13.68%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


NEE

1D
2.41%
1M
-11.62%
YTD
7.45%
6M
1.99%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
13.68%

DUK

1D
1.00%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
5.09%
6M
2.91%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEE vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
7.45%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%34.39%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
5.09%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NEE and DUK is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2003

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between NEE and DUK has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

NEE:

$5.27

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

NEE:

16.26

DUK:

18.33

PEG Ratio

NEE:

0.83

DUK:

1.43

PS Ratio

NEE:

4.76

DUK:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEE:

$27.93B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEE:

$13.35B

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEE:

$14.56B

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEE vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEE vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEEDUKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

0.48

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

0.77

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

0.59

+1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.24

1.46

+3.78

NEE vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEE and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEEDUKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.48

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.43

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.42

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.49

+0.13

Drawdowns

NEE vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEE drawdown since its inception was -47.81%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEE and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEEDUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.81%

-71.92%

+24.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-10.88%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.57%

-11.59%

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.97%

-24.16%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-37.37%

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.46%

-8.48%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-10.85%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

4.41%

+0.34%

Volatility

NEE vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 4.88%. This indicates that NEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEEDUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

4.88%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

11.21%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.77%

14.39%

+9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.89%

17.80%

+9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

20.38%

+5.10%

Dividends

NEE vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than DUK's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.52%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.05%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

NEE vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NextEra Energy, Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
6.70B
9.18B
(NEE) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NEE vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NextEra Energy, Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
67.9%
Portfolio components
NEE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

NEE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

NEE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NextEra Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 6.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NEE and DUK have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEE has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to DUK (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEE dropped -47.81% vs DUK's -71.92%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEE and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer