NEE vs. CEG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG).

Performance

NEE vs. CEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NEE vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc.	16.48%	15.47%	21.46%	-25.30%	9.85%
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	-20.85%	58.80%	92.71%	37.24%	64.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NEE : $194.03B CEG : $87.68B
EPS NEE : $3.30 CEG : $7.39
PE Ratio NEE : 28.14 CEG : 37.81
PEG Ratio NEE : 1.43 CEG : 0.66
PS Ratio NEE : 7.00 CEG : 3.35
PB Ratio NEE : 3.55 CEG : 6.04
Total Revenue (TTM) NEE : $27.48B CEG : $26.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) NEE : $17.26B CEG : -$3.91B
EBITDA (TTM) NEE : $15.53B CEG : $3.98B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEE achieves a 16.48% return, which is significantly higher than CEG's -20.85% return.

NEE

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 24.71%
• 1Y: 34.91%
• 3Y*: 9.56%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 14.98%

CEG

• 1D: -6.48%
• 1M: -15.23%
• YTD: -20.85%
• 6M: -14.93%
• 1Y: 39.20%
• 3Y*: 53.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NEE vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEE

NEE Risk / Return Rank: 81
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CEG

CEG Risk / Return Rank: 65
CEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CEG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CEG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEE vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NEE	CEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	0.76	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.32	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.17	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	0.95	+2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.11	2.57	+4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NEE vs. CEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the CEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEE and CEG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEE	CEG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	0.76	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.03	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between NEE and CEG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NEE vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison

NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CEG's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc.	2.50%	2.82%	2.87%	3.08%	2.03%	1.65%	1.81%	2.06%	2.55%	2.52%	2.91%	2.96%
CEG Constellation Energy Corp	0.57%	0.44%	0.63%	0.97%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NEE vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEE drawdown since its inception was -47.81%, smaller than the maximum CEG drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEE and CEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEE	CEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.81%	-50.70%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-38.77%	+27.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	-30.70%	+28.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-10.82%	+1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	14.27%	-9.24%

Volatility

NEE vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is 5.20%, while Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a volatility of 16.75%. This indicates that NEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEE	CEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	16.75%	-11.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.70%	36.99%	-22.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.79%	51.89%	-26.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.53%	49.33%	-22.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.24%	49.33%	-24.09%

Financials