PAVE vs. HEWJ
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while HEWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 19.69%/yr vs 22.86%/yr for HEWJ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HEWJ.
Performance
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 22.54% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 25.28% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 22.06%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 25.63%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
HEWJ
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 58.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 22.54% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 25.28% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 18.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and HEWJ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PAVE and HEWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
HEWJ
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PAVE
HEWJ
Basic Materials
PAVE
HEWJ
Utilities
PAVE
HEWJ
Technology
PAVE
HEWJ
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
HEWJ
Energy
PAVE
HEWJ
Communication Services
PAVE
-
HEWJ
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
HEWJ
Financial Services
PAVE
-
HEWJ
Healthcare
PAVE
-
HEWJ
Real Estate
PAVE
-
HEWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
HEWJ
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.54 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 5.65 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 21.85 | -9.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than HEWJ's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and HEWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -31.53% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -10.37% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -20.90% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -20.90% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -6.59% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.68% | +0.59% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | HEWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 6.27% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.79% | 14.73% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 19.39% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.18% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 19.68% | +4.71% |
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAVE vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than HEWJ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.07% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to HEWJ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.
On 5-year performance, HEWJ leads with 22.86% vs 19.69% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 19.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.75% for PAVE.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while HEWJ is Japan Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and HEWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer