HEWJ vs. FLJH
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HEWJ tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index while FLJH tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEWJ returned 20.58%/yr vs 20.07%/yr for FLJH. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.
Performance
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HEWJ having a 16.53% return and FLJH slightly higher at 16.70%.
HEWJ
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 49.46%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
FLJH
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 16.70%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 43.98%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- —
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 16.53% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 1.20% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 16.70% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -14.66% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and FLJH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HEWJ and FLJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
FLJH
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
FLJH
Technology
HEWJ
FLJH
Financial Services
HEWJ
FLJH
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
FLJH
Communication Services
HEWJ
FLJH
Healthcare
HEWJ
FLJH
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
FLJH
Basic Materials
HEWJ
FLJH
Real Estate
HEWJ
FLJH
Utilities
HEWJ
FLJH
Energy
HEWJ
FLJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
FLJH
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEWJ | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 4.09 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 16.01 | +2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEWJ | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.42 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.73 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and FLJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -31.51% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -10.80% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -20.39% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -20.39% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -3.09% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -5.31% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.76% | -0.11% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 4.39%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.39% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 13.78% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 18.24% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 18.56% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 19.84% | -0.17% |
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than FLJH's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.34% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.38% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HEWJ and FLJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HEWJ has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FLJH (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs FLJH's -31.51%.
On 5-year performance, HEWJ leads with 20.58% vs 20.07% for FLJH. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 20.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.34% for FLJH.
HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.09% for FLJH.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and FLJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer