HEWJ vs. DBJP
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HEWJ tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ returned 15.80%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for DBJP. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HEWJ having a 16.53% return and DBJP slightly higher at 16.67%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HEWJ having a 15.80% annualized return and DBJP not far ahead at 15.87%.
HEWJ
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 49.46%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
DBJP
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 49.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 16.53% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 21.47% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 16.67% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and DBJP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014 | 0.98 |
The correlation between HEWJ and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
DBJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
DBJP
Technology
HEWJ
DBJP
Financial Services
HEWJ
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
DBJP
Communication Services
HEWJ
DBJP
Healthcare
HEWJ
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
DBJP
Basic Materials
HEWJ
DBJP
Real Estate
HEWJ
DBJP
Utilities
HEWJ
DBJP
Energy
HEWJ
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
DBJP
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEWJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 4.79 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 18.63 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEWJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.62 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.82 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.67 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -31.30% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -10.39% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -21.50% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -21.50% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | -31.30% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -3.50% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -7.29% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.67% | -0.02% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) have volatilities of 5.07% and 4.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.97% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 14.27% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 19.02% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 18.99% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 19.48% | +0.19% |
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than DBJP's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.41% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.38% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, HEWJ and DBJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HEWJ has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to DBJP (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 15.87% vs 15.80% for HEWJ. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 15.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.41% for DBJP.
HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer