PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 19.01%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.27% annualized return.


GRID

1D
-4.79%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
22.65%
6M
22.49%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*
19.01%

QQQ

1D
-4.80%
1M
1.34%
YTD
14.92%
6M
13.01%
1Y
35.00%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
21.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
22.65%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
14.92%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and QQQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009

0.65

The correlation between GRID and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRID vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
QQQ

Industrials

65.2%
2.8%

Utilities

20.4%
1.4%

Technology

11.0%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
12.3%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Industrials

GRID
65.2%
QQQ
2.8%

Utilities

GRID
20.4%
QQQ
1.4%

Technology

GRID
11.0%
QQQ
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
3.5%
QQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

GRID

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

GRID

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

GRID

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

GRID

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

GRID

-

QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRIDQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.94

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.24

11.22

+3.02

GRID vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRIDQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.11

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.95

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.40

+0.16

Drawdowns

GRID vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-82.97%

+42.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-11.96%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-22.77%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-35.12%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-35.12%

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-5.51%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-32.78%

+24.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.13%

-0.01%

Volatility

GRID vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.68%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

6.68%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

13.12%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

16.69%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

22.47%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

22.34%

+0.51%

GRID vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than QQQ's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and QQQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to QQQ (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.27% vs 19.01% for GRID. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.27% return vs 19.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.40% for QQQ.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.18% for QQQ.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer