PAVE vs. NFRA
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and NFRA (FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while NFRA is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 18.34%/yr vs 5.69%/yr for NFRA. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.47% expense ratio.
Performance
PAVE vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly higher than NFRA's 7.66% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 37.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.34%
- 10Y*
- —
NFRA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
PAVE vs. NFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.97% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 7.66% | 18.42% | 4.76% | 8.96% | -10.11% | 9.61% | 2.24% | 26.27% | -7.74% | 11.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and NFRA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PAVE and NFRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAVE vs. NFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
NFRA
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PAVE
NFRA
Basic Materials
PAVE
NFRA
-
Utilities
PAVE
NFRA
Technology
PAVE
NFRA
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
NFRA
Energy
PAVE
NFRA
Communication Services
PAVE
-
NFRA
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
NFRA
Financial Services
PAVE
-
NFRA
Healthcare
PAVE
-
NFRA
Real Estate
PAVE
-
NFRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. NFRA — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
NFRA
PAVE vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.21 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 1.70 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.34 | 5.27 | +6.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than NFRA's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and NFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -32.49% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -7.28% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -11.15% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -22.75% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -3.28% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -4.52% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.35% | +0.92% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) at 2.96%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 2.96% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.90% | 8.46% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 10.49% | +9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 12.97% | +8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 14.89% | +9.51% |
PAVE vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAVE and NFRA have an expense ratio of 0.47%.
Dividends
PAVE vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than NFRA's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.75% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and NFRA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to NFRA (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs NFRA's -32.49%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 18.34% vs 5.69% for NFRA. Both ETFs have the same 0.47% expense ratio. On volatility, NFRA has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE and NFRA have the same expense ratio: 0.47% per year.
NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NFRA is Utilities Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while NFRA tracks STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FlexShares.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and NFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer