PAVE vs. ECLN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while ECLN is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. PAVE is passively managed, while ECLN is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.52%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for ECLN. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ECLN.

Performance

PAVE vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly higher than ECLN's 12.78% return.

PAVE

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 20.55%
• 6M: 19.00%
• 1Y: 37.89%
• 3Y*: 27.31%
• 5Y*: 17.52%
• 10Y*: —

ECLN

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 10.71%
• 1Y: 21.20%
• 3Y*: 17.36%
• 5Y*: 11.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	20.55%	19.36%	17.92%	31.01%	-7.17%	36.42%	19.72%	17.17%
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	12.78%	16.78%	22.60%	-3.36%	5.28%	12.26%	8.98%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and ECLN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2019	0.51

The correlation between PAVE and ECLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAVE vs. ECLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAVE	ECLN
Industrials	74.8%	6.8%
Basic Materials	20.3%	-
Utilities	3.2%	76.4%
Technology	1.1%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Energy	0.2%	16.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PAVE vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 62
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ECLN

ECLN Risk / Return Rank: 66
ECLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ECLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ECLN Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ECLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ECLN Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAVE	ECLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.04	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.98	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	4.24	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	11.40	+0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAVE vs. ECLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the ECLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and ECLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAVE	ECLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.04	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.85	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.68	+0.01

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than ECLN's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and ECLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAVE	ECLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-32.28%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-5.02%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.23%	-14.68%	-11.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.23%	-19.88%	-6.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-3.11%	+1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-4.99%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	1.86%	+1.38%

Volatility

PAVE vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison

Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) at 3.91%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAVE	ECLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	3.91%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	8.12%	+7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.80%	10.52%	+8.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.60%	14.22%	+7.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.38%	17.41%	+6.97%

PAVE vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAVE vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than ECLN's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.82%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.76%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAVE and ECLN in my portfolio?

PAVE and ECLN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAVE or ECLN?

PAVE has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to ECLN (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs ECLN's -32.28%.

Which ETF is better, PAVE or ECLN?

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.52% vs 11.98% for ECLN. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ECLN has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAVE or ECLN?

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAVE or ECLN?

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAVE or ECLN?

ECLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.

What is the main difference between PAVE and ECLN?

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ECLN is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.97% for ECLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.