ECLN vs. DBEM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ECLN (First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF) and DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECLN is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while DBEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. ECLN is actively managed, while DBEM is passively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ECLN charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DBEM.

Performance

ECLN vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ECLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DBEM

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -3.61%
• 6M: 10.65%
• YTD: 20.24%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 9.29%
• ALL TIME*: 5.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	$211.50K	$783.62K	$503.56K

ECLN vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	12.96%	16.78%	22.60%	-3.36%	5.28%	12.26%	8.98%	5.66%
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	20.24%	30.42%	10.61%	10.53%	-17.00%	-2.26%	18.12%	13.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ECLN and DBEM is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019	0.32

The correlation between ECLN and DBEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECLN vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECLN	DBEM
Utilities	56.7%	1.8%
Energy	13.3%	3.2%
Industrials	8.3%	6.3%
Technology	1.7%	45.3%
Basic Materials	-	5.5%
Communication Services	-	6.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Financial Services	-	18.4%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

ECLN vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DBEM

DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 73
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECLN vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECLN	DBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.22	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.23	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ECLN	DBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.51%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.90%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.64%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ECLN	DBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.40%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.97%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.57%	—

ECLN vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECLN vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison

ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	2.19%	1.84%	2.48%	2.55%	2.65%	1.77%	1.74%	2.59%	2.85%	1.51%	1.59%	3.49%
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF	1.43%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECLN and DBEM in my portfolio?

ECLN and DBEM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ECLN or DBEM?

On fees, DBEM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECLN or DBEM?

DBEM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECLN or DBEM?

DBEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.

What is the main difference between ECLN and DBEM?

ECLN is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DBEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.66% for DBEM.