PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECLN vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECLN vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ECLN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

UTES

1D
-0.03%
1M
-4.28%
6M
0.59%
YTD
-1.07%
1Y
-3.98%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
11.78%
ALL TIME*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.16M$10.04M$13.72M

ECLN vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
12.96%16.78%22.60%-3.36%5.28%12.26%8.98%5.66%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
-1.07%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ECLN and UTES is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between ECLN and UTES has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ECLN vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECLN
UTES

Utilities

56.7%
100.0%

Energy

13.3%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Technology

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

ECLN
56.7%
UTES
100.0%

Energy

ECLN
13.3%
UTES

-

Industrials

ECLN
8.3%
UTES

-

Technology

ECLN
1.7%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Communication Services

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Financial Services

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Healthcare

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Real Estate

ECLN

-

UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECLN vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECLN vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECLNUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

ECLN vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECLN vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECLNUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.72%

Volatility

ECLN vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECLNUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

ECLN vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECLN vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
1.43%1.97%2.52%2.54%1.72%1.66%1.68%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.53%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECLN and UTES have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.49% for UTES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECLN and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer