PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 25.53% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.05% return.


PAVE

1D
2.71%
1M
6.54%
YTD
25.53%
6M
22.68%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
0.08%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
1.05%
6M
0.24%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
25.53%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%13.41%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
1.05%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%42.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and BOTZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017

0.68

The correlation between PAVE and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAVE
BOTZ

Industrials

75.9%
49.3%

Basic Materials

19.5%
0.0%

Utilities

3.1%
0.0%

Technology

1.0%
31.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
0.0%

Energy

0.2%
0.5%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.4%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PAVE
75.9%
BOTZ
49.3%

Basic Materials

PAVE
19.5%
BOTZ
0.0%

Utilities

PAVE
3.1%
BOTZ
0.0%

Technology

PAVE
1.0%
BOTZ
31.8%

Consumer Defensive

PAVE
0.2%
BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

PAVE
0.2%
BOTZ
0.5%

Communication Services

PAVE

-

BOTZ
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PAVE

-

BOTZ
6.4%

Financial Services

PAVE

-

BOTZ
0.9%

Healthcare

PAVE

-

BOTZ
8.0%

Real Estate

PAVE

-

BOTZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAVEBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

0.88

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

2.77

+9.97

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-55.54%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-19.34%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-29.02%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-55.54%

+29.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.06%

+12.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-18.26%

+12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

6.10%

-2.83%

Volatility

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.11%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

9.78%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

20.00%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

25.43%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

27.03%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

25.82%

-1.42%

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAVE vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.73%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to PAVE (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 19.18% vs 1.06% for BOTZ. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 19.18% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.65% for BOTZ.

PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.68% for BOTZ.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer