PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAUG vs. BOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAUG vs. BOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than BOCT's 6.08% return.


PAUG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.53%
YTD
4.55%
6M
5.16%
1Y
14.25%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*

BOCT

1D
0.17%
1M
0.44%
YTD
6.08%
6M
6.65%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAUG vs. BOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
4.55%12.34%15.37%17.71%-6.85%7.58%9.82%3.60%
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
6.08%14.34%12.36%21.13%-8.14%14.97%14.69%4.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PAUG and BOCT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.91

The correlation between PAUG and BOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAUG vs. BOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAUG
BOCT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PAUG
36.2%
BOCT
36.2%

Financial Services

PAUG
11.9%
BOCT
11.9%

Communication Services

PAUG
10.9%
BOCT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PAUG
10.1%
BOCT
10.1%

Healthcare

PAUG
8.4%
BOCT
8.4%

Industrials

PAUG
8.1%
BOCT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

PAUG
4.9%
BOCT
4.9%

Energy

PAUG
3.5%
BOCT
3.5%

Utilities

PAUG
2.3%
BOCT
2.3%

Real Estate

PAUG
1.9%
BOCT
1.9%

Basic Materials

PAUG
1.8%
BOCT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAUG vs. BOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAUG
PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAUG vs. BOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAUGBOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.44

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.05

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.71

14.61

+5.10

PAUG vs. BOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the BOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAUG and BOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAUGBOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.26

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.94

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.75

+0.11

Drawdowns

PAUG vs. BOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum BOCT drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and BOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAUGBOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-24.54%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-6.09%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.45%

-13.61%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-14.29%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.17%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-2.60%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.27%

-0.55%

Volatility

PAUG vs. BOCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 0.67%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAUGBOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.76%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

6.26%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

8.25%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.71%

11.11%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

13.82%

-3.23%

PAUG vs. BOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PAUG and BOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

PAUG vs. BOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAUG nor BOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PAUG and BOCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BOCT has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to PAUG (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAUG dropped -17.88% vs BOCT's -24.54%.

On 5-year performance, BOCT leads with 10.35% vs 9.08% for PAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 10.35% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAUG and BOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

PAUG and BOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index.

PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAUG and BOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer