PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOCT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOCT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.


BOCT

1D
0.04%
1M
2.79%
YTD
7.34%
6M
8.06%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
7.34%14.34%12.36%21.13%-8.14%14.97%14.69%19.05%-10.25%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and VOO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.94

The correlation between BOCT and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOCT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOCT
VOO

Technology

36.2%
35.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.5%

Industrials

8.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BOCT
36.2%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

BOCT
11.9%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

BOCT
10.9%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BOCT
10.1%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

BOCT
8.4%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

BOCT
8.1%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

BOCT
4.9%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

BOCT
3.5%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

BOCT
2.3%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

BOCT
1.9%
VOO
1.9%

Basic Materials

BOCT
1.8%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOCT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOCTVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.53

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

3.43

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.42

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.80

15.95

+0.85

BOCT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOCTVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.53

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.85

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.89

-0.12

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-33.99%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-8.90%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-18.69%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

-24.52%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-3.69%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.91%

-0.65%

Volatility

BOCT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) is 1.37%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that BOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOCTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.74%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

8.88%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

11.78%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

16.81%

-5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

18.01%

-4.18%

BOCT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOCT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BOCT and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to BOCT (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 10.67% for BOCT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BOCT.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for BOCT.

BOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VOO is S&P 500. BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.03% for VOO.

BOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOCT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer