BOCT vs. POCT
BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BOCT tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index while POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOCT returned 10.67%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BOCT vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.54% return.
BOCT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
BOCT vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 7.34% | 14.34% | 12.36% | 21.13% | -8.14% | 14.97% | 14.69% | 19.05% | -10.25% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.54% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 12.80% | -7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOCT and POCT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BOCT and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
BOCT vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOCT
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BOCT
POCT
Financial Services
BOCT
POCT
Communication Services
BOCT
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
BOCT
POCT
Healthcare
BOCT
POCT
Industrials
BOCT
POCT
Consumer Defensive
BOCT
POCT
Energy
BOCT
POCT
Utilities
BOCT
POCT
Real Estate
BOCT
POCT
Basic Materials
BOCT
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOCT vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
BOCT
POCT
BOCT vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOCT | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.48 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 3.56 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.53 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 18.14 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOCT | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.48 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.88 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BOCT vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOCT | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -18.80% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.09% | -4.40% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.61% | -10.22% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | -10.22% | -4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -1.50% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 0.86% | +0.40% |
Volatility
BOCT vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.92%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOCT | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.92% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.12% | 4.78% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 6.16% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 7.94% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 10.23% | +3.60% |
BOCT vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BOCT and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BOCT vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOCT nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BOCT and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BOCT has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to POCT (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, BOCT leads with 10.67% vs 9.90% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOCT and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BOCT and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.
BOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOCT and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer