PATN vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, PATN returned 55.10% vs 31.49% for IFLO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PATN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

PATN vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 31.66% return, which is significantly higher than IFLO's 18.83% return.

PATN

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -2.27%
• 6M: 24.14%
• YTD: 31.66%
• 1Y: 55.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IFLO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.45%
• 6M: 15.93%
• YTD: 18.83%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATN vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	31.66%	20.58%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	18.83%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and IFLO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.72

The correlation between PATN and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

PATN vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PATN	IFLO
Technology	52.5%	21.5%
Industrials	14.8%	18.1%
Healthcare	9.4%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	13.8%
Communication Services	6.1%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	2.8%
Basic Materials	2.4%	11.3%
Energy	2.1%	12.1%
Financial Services	0.5%	1.1%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

PATN vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 85
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 86

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 88
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATN vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATN	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.16	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	3.13	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	4.91	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.11	16.57	-2.46

PATN vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATN vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATN	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-6.44%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-6.44%	-7.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.29%	-1.80%	-5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-1.29%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	1.92%	+2.00%

Volatility

PATN vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.54%. This indicates that PATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATN	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	3.54%	+6.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.21%	12.03%	+10.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.65%	14.68%	+9.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.50%	14.58%	+7.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.50%	14.58%	+7.92%

PATN vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PATN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

PATN vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.57%	0.73%	0.00%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.65%	2.25%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATN and IFLO in my portfolio?

PATN and IFLO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATN or IFLO?

PATN has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to IFLO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, PATN or IFLO?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 55.10% vs 31.49% for IFLO. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PATN or IFLO?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 55.10% return vs 31.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PATN or IFLO?

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PATN or IFLO?

PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between PATN and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PATN and 0.56% for IFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.