PATN vs. DNL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) and DNL (WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index while DNL tracks the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PATN returned 65.39% vs 17.78% for DNL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PATN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DNL.

Performance

PATN vs. DNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATN achieves a 34.64% return, which is significantly higher than DNL's 9.98% return.

PATN

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 34.64%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 65.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DNL

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 9.83%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATN vs. DNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	34.64%	40.01%	-1.73%
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	9.98%	17.03%	-6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PATN and DNL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.89

The correlation between PATN and DNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PATN vs. DNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PATN	DNL
Technology	52.5%	35.1%
Industrials	14.8%	15.9%
Healthcare	9.4%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	18.3%
Communication Services	6.1%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	2.4%	3.2%
Energy	2.1%	5.8%
Financial Services	0.5%	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

PATN vs. DNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

DNL

DNL Risk / Return Rank: 30
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 27
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATN vs. DNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PATN	DNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	0.95	+1.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	1.44	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.18	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	1.44	+3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.76	5.12	+12.64

PATN vs. DNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATN Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the DNL Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATN and DNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PATN vs. DNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATN drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum DNL drawdown of -44.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATN and DNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATN	DNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-44.53%	+27.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-12.42%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.19%	-2.88%	-2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-10.14%	+6.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	3.48%	+0.21%

Volatility

PATN vs. DNL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) at 7.18%. This indicates that PATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATN	DNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.88%	7.18%	+5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.37%	16.15%	+5.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	18.79%	+5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.26%	18.42%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.26%	18.61%	+3.65%

PATN vs. DNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PATN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DNL's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PATN vs. DNL - Dividend Comparison

PATN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than DNL's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.66%	2.06%	2.30%	1.81%	4.82%	1.38%	1.76%	1.93%	2.55%	1.86%	2.51%	1.98%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATN and DNL in my portfolio?

PATN and DNL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATN or DNL?

PATN has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to DNL (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATN dropped -16.77% vs DNL's -44.53%.

Which ETF is better, PATN or DNL?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 65.39% vs 17.78% for DNL. On fees, DNL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PATN or DNL?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 65.39% return vs 17.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PATN or DNL?

DNL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PATN or DNL?

DNL has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.61% for PATN.

What is the main difference between PATN and DNL?

PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index, while DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PATN and 0.58% for DNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.