PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAPI vs. CCEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAPI vs. CCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PAPI having a 6.13% return and CCEF slightly higher at 6.14%.


PAPI

1D
0.45%
1M
1.27%
YTD
6.13%
6M
5.29%
1Y
12.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CCEF

1D
0.46%
1M
2.31%
YTD
6.14%
6M
8.18%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAPI vs. CCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
6.13%6.33%9.65%
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
6.14%13.47%17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PAPI and CCEF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024

0.53

The correlation between PAPI and CCEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAPI vs. CCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPI vs. CCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAPICCEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.36

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.03

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

8.76

-4.06

PAPI vs. CCEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the CCEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPI and CCEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAPI vs. CCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPI drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, which is greater than CCEF's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPI and CCEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAPICCEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.27%

-13.25%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-7.75%

+0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-0.41%

-4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-1.35%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.79%

+0.90%

Volatility

PAPI vs. CCEF - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAPICCEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.69%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

7.00%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

8.22%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

10.79%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.75%

10.79%

+0.96%

PAPI vs. CCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CCEF's 2.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAPI vs. CCEF - Dividend Comparison

PAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, less than CCEF's 7.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
7.95%8.08%6.55%0.00%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.59%7.59%7.07%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAPI and CCEF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCEF has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to PAPI (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPI dropped -14.27% vs CCEF's -13.25%.

On 1-year performance, CCEF leads with 15.68% vs 12.60% for PAPI. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CCEF has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 7.59% for PAPI.

PAPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while CCEF is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PAPI and 2.74% for CCEF.

CCEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAPI and CCEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer