PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAMC vs. TPLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAMC vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than TPLC's 11.20% return.


PAMC

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.96%
6M
11.11%
YTD
15.63%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.20%

TPLC

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.50%
6M
7.18%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$146.26K$127.92K$342.42K
$634.79K$704.66K$1.85M

PAMC vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
15.63%1.54%26.20%19.30%-12.15%13.15%34.86%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
11.20%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%26.34%28.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PAMC and TPLC is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.88

The correlation between PAMC and TPLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAMC vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAMC
TPLC

Industrials

23.2%
23.4%

Financial Services

19.8%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
8.8%

Technology

10.8%
18.6%

Energy

7.8%
7.2%

Real Estate

6.8%
0.2%

Healthcare

5.8%
9.6%

Basic Materials

5.5%
5.7%

Utilities

3.5%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.6%

Communication Services

0.8%
0.2%

Industrials

PAMC
23.2%
TPLC
23.4%

Financial Services

PAMC
19.8%
TPLC
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PAMC
12.5%
TPLC
8.8%

Technology

PAMC
10.8%
TPLC
18.6%

Energy

PAMC
7.8%
TPLC
7.2%

Real Estate

PAMC
6.8%
TPLC
0.2%

Healthcare

PAMC
5.8%
TPLC
9.6%

Basic Materials

PAMC
5.5%
TPLC
5.7%

Utilities

PAMC
3.5%
TPLC
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

PAMC
3.4%
TPLC
3.6%

Communication Services

PAMC
0.8%
TPLC
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAMC vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAMC
PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAMC vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAMCTPLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.59

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

5.75

+2.67

PAMC vs. TPLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the TPLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMC and TPLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum TPLC drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and TPLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAMCTPLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.04%

-38.02%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-7.58%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.07%

-18.18%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

-21.63%

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-1.31%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-5.20%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.09%

+0.74%

Volatility

PAMC vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) at 2.63%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAMCTPLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

2.63%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

8.37%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

11.58%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.21%

16.12%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

19.73%

+0.89%

PAMC vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAMC vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than TPLC's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
1.12%1.11%0.97%0.69%1.29%0.36%0.30%0.00%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.83%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAMC and TPLC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAMC has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to TPLC (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs TPLC's -38.02%.

On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 9.60% vs 7.98% for TPLC. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.83% for TPLC.

PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.52% for TPLC.

PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAMC and TPLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer