PAMC vs. SRVR
PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAMC returned 9.60%/yr vs -3.01%/yr for SRVR. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
PAMC vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 8.80% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.20%
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $146.26K | $127.92K | $342.42K | |
| $1.88M | $2.23M | $2.66M |
PAMC vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 15.63% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.86% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 8.80% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and SRVR is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PAMC and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
SRVR
PAMC vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAMC | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | -0.02 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | -0.05 | +8.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -40.99% | +13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -15.01% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.07% | -18.34% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -40.99% | +14.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -20.33% | +17.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -15.30% | +7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 6.18% | -3.35% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 4.30%, while Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.05% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 14.27% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 17.42% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 19.89% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 21.39% | -0.77% |
PAMC vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAMC vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SRVR's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.12% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.81% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAMC and SRVR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to PAMC (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 9.60% vs -3.01% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PAMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 9.60% return vs -3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.12% for PAMC.
PAMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SRVR is REIT. PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.49% for SRVR.
PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAMC and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer