PAMC vs. SRVR
PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAMC returned 9.24%/yr vs -1.27%/yr for SRVR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PAMC vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PAMC having a 18.25% return and SRVR slightly lower at 17.97%.
PAMC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 18.25%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- —
PAMC vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 18.25% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.86% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 17.97% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and SRVR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PAMC and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
SRVR
PAMC vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAMC | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.07 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 0.40 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 0.84 | +9.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -40.99% | +13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -14.78% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.07% | -18.34% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -40.99% | +14.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -13.62% | +12.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -15.24% | +7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 6.94% | -4.18% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 5.66% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.37% | 13.59% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 17.29% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 19.78% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 21.44% | -0.72% |
PAMC vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAMC and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PAMC vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than SRVR's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.10% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.59% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAMC and SRVR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to PAMC (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 9.24% vs -1.27% for SRVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PAMC has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 9.24% return vs -1.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAMC and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.10% for PAMC.
PAMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SRVR is REIT. PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index.
PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAMC and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer