PAMC vs. PTNQ
PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAMC returned 9.92%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for PTNQ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 9.23% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 21.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 15.47% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.86% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 9.23% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 23.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and PTNQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PAMC and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
PTNQ
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAMC | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.80 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 5.78 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, roughly equal to the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -28.07% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -11.76% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.07% | -14.19% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -18.47% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -4.46% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -5.67% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.65% | -0.85% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 4.91%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 8.09% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 14.42% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 17.86% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 13.56% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 16.53% | +4.14% |
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAMC vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than PTNQ's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.13% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.81% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAMC and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to PAMC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.
On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 9.93% vs 9.92% for PAMC. On fees, PAMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PAMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.81% for PTNQ.
PAMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.65% for PTNQ.
PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAMC and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer